Kontakt     Hauptseite     zurück
previous chapterprevious     nextnext chapter
D     ESP

"Moon plays": The moon was the Earth - Lies and Truth in the Atmosphere

14. The faked Gemini missions and the faked "moon probes"

The faked Gemini flights since Gemini 6A according to landing data - faked "moon fotos" of the "moon probes" Surveyor

Gemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the
                    alleged redezvous performance structures of the hall
                    can be clearly seen.
vergrössernGemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the alleged rendezvous performance
structures of the hall can be clearly seen.

by Michael Palomino (2006)

Teilen :

Facebook






from: Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space]; Knaur 2006


The development of the atmosphere crafts "Gemini"

One can see that "SU" "Vostok" atmosphere craft was much bigger than "US" "Mercury", and "US" "Gemini" is about as big as "SU" "Vostok".

Scheme with the comparison of
                            Vostok, Mercury and Gemini atmosphere
                            crafts
vergrössernScheme with the comparison of Vostok, Mercury and Gemini atmosphere crafts


The impossible landing data from the Gemini missions since Gemini 6A


NASA claims that missions with Gemini atmosphere ships had been circling around the earth. But according to the landing data of the landing capsules all Gemini missions since Gemini 6A are a fake because the landings since Gemini 6A are much too precise to be real landings from an Earth orbit. Real landings from an Earth orbit mostly have an aberration of 100s up to 1,000s of km also in a very precise working team, and a precise landing can be only a lucky chance. But the Gemini flights since Gemini 6A are regularly this precise that they can only be explained by airdrops as it was made in training 1,000s of times.

(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle; Pomeroy 2002; Wisnewski, p.237-243).

[Add to this the "USA" wanted to be brilliant against the "SU" with "precise landings", and the media never want to have recognized the manipulations...]

Gemini landing data
Date of landing Atmosphere ship landed Aberration from the foreseen landing point
16 Feb 1965 / 2-16-1965 Gemini 6A 12.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18 Dec1965 / 12-18-1965 Gemini 7 11.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
17 March 1966 / 3-17-1966 Gemini 8 2    kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6 June 1966 / 6-6-1966 Gemini 9A 0.7 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
21 July 1966 / 7-21-1966 Gemini 10 6.2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
15 Sep 1966 / 9-15-1966 Gemini 11 4.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
15 Nov 1966 / 11-15-1966 Gemini 12 4.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

These Gemini landing data are from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.com: Splashdown, August 2006).

Fotos from the "US" NASA propaganda from Gemini 6A up to Gemini 12
Gemini 6A and 7 foto
                                  no.S65-63189: In the alleged redezvous
                                  performance structures of the hall can
                                  be clearly seen.
vergrössernGemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the alleged rendezvous performance structures of the hall can be clearly seen.
Gemini 7, foto no.S65-63194: The
                                  foto of Gemini 7 of an Earth orbit is
                                  as lie.
vergrössernGemini 7, foto no.S65-63194: The foto of Gemini 7 of an Earth orbit is as lie.
Splashdown of Gemini 9A, foto
                                    no. 66C-5085. With only 0,7 km
                                    aberration from the planned landing
                                    point also this flight is a lie.
vergrössernSplashdown of Gemini 9A, foto no. 66C-5085. With only 0.7 km aberration from the planned landing point also this flight is a lie.

Splashdown of Gemini 10 foto
                                    no. 66C-6532: According to the
                                    landing data with an aberration of
                                    6,2 km from the planned landing
                                    point also this flight is a lie as
                                    all other flights since Gemini 6A.
vergrössernSplashdown of Gemini 10 foto no. 66C-6532: According to the landing data with an aberration of 6.2 km from the planned landing point also this flight is a lie as all other flights since Gemini 6A.

Gemini-Titan 11, foto
                                    no.66PC-0261: Alleged start of the
                                    rocket.
vergrössernGemini-Titan 11, foto no.66PC-0261: Alleged start of the rocket.

Gemini 12 foto no. 66C-9516:
                                    Splashdown, and also this flight
                                    according to the landing data with
                                    an aberration of only 4,8 km from
                                    the planned landing point is a lie.
vergrössernGemini 12 foto no. 66C-9516: Splashdown, and also this flight according to the landing data with an aberration of only 4.8 km from the planned landing point is a lie.




Gemini Mission Control
                                            Center, foto no. S65-28660:
                                            This is a controll center
                                            without any idea...
vergrössernGemini Mission Control Center, foto no. S65-28660: This is a control center without any idea...
vergrössernAt the same time the Control Center is never asked why the landings from an Earth orbit shall have been all this precise. But in fact the Control Center is not a Control Center but an alibi institution of the manipulators of the simulation centers at Langley and Houston. The control center has no idea and the control is guided from somewhere else.



It's not strange that the CIA headquarters are situated at the same place as one of the simulation centers: at Langley...


Faked moon fotos from faked "moon probes" "Surveyor"

Surveyor 1: Alleged "moon landing" 30 May 1966 / 5-30-1966
Surveyor 2: Alleged "moon landing" 17 April 1967 / 4-17-1967
Surveyor 3: Alleged "moon landing" 8 Sep 1967 / 9-8-1967
Surveyor 4: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Nov 1967 / 11-7-1967
Surveyor 5: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Jan 1968 / 1-7-1968

All in all the Surveyor moon probes shall have transmitted over 85,000 fotos from the moon over a distance of 380,000 km to the Earth (Wisnewski, p.216).

But only considering the radio transmitting connection over this distance through the radioactive belts seems impossible. And NASA historian James R. Hansen reveals in his book "Spaceflight Revolution" the fraud directly unmasking alleged foto of surveyor as pictures from the moon simulation device "LOLA". The alleged first foto of an "Earth rise" (foto no. I-102H2) is in reality the foto L-66-6399.66 ("L" stands for Langley, the simulation center near Hampton in Virginia).

(Wisnewski, p.286-288).

[So there is the question if also all other "moon probes" are a fake, also these of the "Soviet Union". Because a radio transmitting connection of over 380,000 km seems absolutely doubtful and is also non controllable, and considering the rotation of the Earth, sch a connection is absolutely impossible. And at the same time NASA is numbering all their "photos" simulating a "scientific" manner of working, and the stupid media are believing this...].

But artificial moon surfaces are very real, according to NASA historian Hanson. Moon surfaces can be easily imitated,
(In: Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution, SP-4308, p.375; Internet edition, http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski, p.284-285)

and artificial moon surfaces can also be published on fotos very well and in fuzzy films as a "real moon surface". And the stupid media believe all, to rise their numbers of copies...

The money is in power - the truth is loosing...


Picture sources

-- comparison Vostok-Mercury-Gemini: Brian Jones: Weltraumforschung; Herder-Verlag 1990, p.47

-- Gemini 6A and 7 rendezvous with parts of the training hall in the foto, foto no. S65-63189: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_40.html; http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001049.jpg

-- Gemini 7 on an Earth orbit, lie: foto no.: S65-63194: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_138.html; http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2006-000035.jpg

-- Gemini 9A splashdown, foto no. 66C-5085: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_37.html; http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001021.jpg

-- Gemini 10 splashdown, foto no. 66C-6532: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_35.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-000995.jpg

-- Gemini Titan 11 start, foto no. 66PC-0261: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_37.html; http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001020.jpg

-- Gemini 12 splashdown, foto no. 66C-9516: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_35.html; http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-000994.jpg

-- Gemini Mission Control Center has no idea of the fakes, foto no.: S65-28660: http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_65.html;  http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001405.jpg

^